Is the New Testament Traditionally Responsible? (section 2 of the “IS” series)

An introductory examine of Christian apologetics reveals that the promises of Christianity had been offered by the early apostles/messengers as verifiable, objective reality. While most other entire world religions/cults avoid empirical and historic investigations, Christianity is grounded on true functions possessing taken put (I Cor. 15:seventeen). In truth, Dr. Steven Collins goes so far as to issue out “Christianity may be the only belief method in the entire world that rests its validity on the reality of selected functions.” This is just one of the key good reasons (together with the assert of the exclusivity of Christian reality – or even reality in common), that Christianity is these types of a frequent goal of derision. The premise that Christianity is “accurate” is based mostly on the acceptance of “reality” according to the “correspondence” view – meaning that reality is that which corresponds to reality. This stands in opposition to concepts of reality getting determined according to “that which is existentially appropriate,” or “that which functions” (pragmatic view), or reality as that which “feels great.” These latter views of reality can be revealed to be not only self-defeating, but also virtually absent in our everyday life, activities, and techniques. Consequently, people are frequently torn in between their individual professed worldviews and the everyday life they reside. Norman Geisler details out that if the pragmatic (“what functions”) view of reality had been utilized to our everyday culture, our total judicial method would be thrown into disarray, considering that witnesses in court docket are not questioned to “swear to tell ‘what functions for you,’ ‘the total of what functions for you,’ and ‘nothing but what functions for you‘” (for a thorough discussion on this and a refutation of Immanuel Kant’s agnosticism, see Norman Geisler’s chapter in Why I Am a Christian entitled “Why I Consider Real truth is True and Knowable” pp. 30 – forty five)     

We observed in the earlier short article how there is true empirical evidence (as a result of what is referred to as common revelation Romans 1:twenty, 2:fourteen-15) which reveals there is some sort of “god” who “results in” (cosmological argument), “designs” (teleological argument), and who as a result of this generation bears evidence of the existence of at least a common “morality” (ethical argument) and meaning (spiritual need / pleasure). Nevertheless some persons to whom we witness and inquire about evidences for the Christian faith will not require this type of “systematic” strategy, the “classical apologist” affirms the previously mentioned premises and tips in get to have a selected grounding for presenting evidences pertaining a lot more especially to Christianity. Geisler expresses the classical strategy this way:

“The primary argument of the classical apologists is that it tends to make no perception to converse about the resurrection as an act of God except, as a rational prerequisite, it is 1st established that there is a God who can act. Also, the Bible can’t be the Word of God except there is a God who can converse. And Christ can’t be revealed to be the Son of God except on the logically prior premise there is a God who can have a Son” (Geisler, ECA) 

So, in the progression of “classical” Christian apologetics, we now shift on sequentially to troubles pertaining a lot more particularly to Christianity. The issue occurs: Has this “god” who is evidenced by signifies of common revelation at any time, in time-space history, been revealed to us inany sort of objective, verifiable method?(not pertaining to simply “thoughts” – or even mere individual, “mystical ordeals” even though these can be deemed “some” evidence for a Christian view of God). The Christian solutions “sure,” meaning that this accurate God revealed himself as a result of an true, traditionally verifiable human being regarded as”Jesus,” who is “the Christ.” “Testing” irrespective of whether or not the Christian’s answer is accurate can be completed applying the similar approved ways we exam all historic truths. Along with considering further-biblical evidences for the Jesus of history, what is frequently termed as “standard historic treatments” can be utilized to the New Testament by itself in get to present “evidence” that it is a legitimate source of historic data. This observe is regarded as historiography, or the “science of historic investigation.” The motive for starting off with the NT as a legitimate source of history is broken down by Dr. Winfried Corduan as follows:

1) The New Testament as history reveals that…

2) it is affordable to imagine in the deity of Christ, who…

three) taught us to settle for the Bible as the Word of Go

For that reason, based mostly on what evidence do we think about the NT to be traditionally trustworthy?

Evidence and Other Historic Writings

The N.T. time time period is regarded as “historical” history. Our frequent knowledge of historical history is based mostly on what is regarded as documentary or “composed” evidence. Retain in mind that the secular entire world depends upon historical writers for its knowledge of the previous. Examples involve: Herodotus, Suetonius, Tacitus, Julius Caesar, and Josephus. A lot of of these who recorded history had been permit alone not eyewitnesses, they had been not even contemporaries of the persons and functions concerning which they documented. For instance, Herodotus (480 – 425 BC) wrote about functions that preceded him by hundreds of several years – still his variation of functions in history are commonly approved (or “thought”) to be correct. They are commonly approved due to the fact there just isn’t any great motive to doubt the primary integrity of the files. A person important issue which need to be utilized is: Are the surviving manuscript copies that we have “primary in pressure?” “Documentary” evidence helps draw conclusions for the answer to this issue. This evidence involves, in the incredibly least, the following topics:

A. Primitive Manuscripts (Do early manuscripts of the files exist?)

B. Amount and High-quality (Do they exist in ample quantity and top quality so that the

     readings of the primary texts can be properly reproduced?)

C. Interior Consistency (Does consistency exist in just the contents of the textual content by itself)

D. Time Proximity (How does the day of creating examine with the time of the functions


Evidence Supporting the New Testament

Gary Habermas notes that “if the similar requirements that are often utilized to other historical writings are also carried out by New Testament scholars, a stable historic foundation emerges for the lifestyle and teachings of Jesus.”  Thus, let us investigate an application of each of these requirements to the NT. The following is a breakdown of these historiography topics and some noteworthy details pertaining to each when evaluating the NT with other historical files:   

A. Primitive Manuscripts and their (B) Amount and High-quality. A person will discover that implementing these guidelines to the N.T. lend it frustrating aid, primarily in comparison to other historical files.

Other Historic Works: Aristophanes (playwright – creating dates 450 – 385 BC) Quantity of primitive manuscript copies: ten Aristotle (philosopher – creating dates 384 – 322 BC) Quantity of primitive manuscript copies: 5 Plato (philosopher – creating dates 427 – 347 BC) Quantity of primitive manuscript copies: seven Suetonius (historian – creating dates Advert 75 – 160) Quantity of primitive manuscript copies: 8 Tacitus (historian – creating dates Advert a hundred)Quantity of primitive manuscript copies: twenty Sophocles (playwright – creating dates 496 – 406 BC)Quantity of primitive manuscript copies: a hundred The most documented historical secular function is Homer’s Iliad, which survives in 643 primitive manuscript copies. Look at all of the previously mentioned with the New Testament (Date of creating Advert forty five-70) with 5,686 primitive Greek manuscripts in existence.

The day of the earliest copy when compared to the time of creating: For most –over 900 to 1,000 several years or even longer. An instance is Aristotle – with the day of creating getting 384-322 BC – and the day of the earliest manuscript copy getting Advert(CE) 1100

Regarding the functions of Aristotle, Plato, and Socrates (who lived in the fifth and fourth hundreds of years BC [BCE] there are no present manuscript copies which day prior to Advert [CE] 1000).

Look at this to the NT: Date of creating Advert forty five – 70 Fragments (Advert 125) A lot of total guides (Advert two hundred)

(* Retain in mind that the comparison which is getting produced is in between what are generally approved by secular scholars as secular files of the similar variety – meaning a textual content preserved on perishable product that was supposed to be distributed on that product. Comparing these to the unusual situation of a bronze pill affixed to the sides of a tomb, or inscriptions carved on temples is evaluating apples to oranges *)

C. Interior Consistency: This is in reference tointernal exams working mainly with the consistency of the particular person files and their common harmony with other files reporting the similar functions.

On the subject of Jesus’ arrest, trial, death, and resurrection in…Matt. 26 Mark fourteen Luke 22 John thirteen -Matt. 28 Mark 16 Luke 24 John twenty concerning variances in details…the situation is basically strengthened, the place minimal variations in the retelling of the similar event are basically lawful earmarks of authenticity.

 In accordance to Historian Paul MeirA lot of details from antiquity relaxation on just just one historical source, whilst two or three sources in agreement commonly render the truth unimpeachable

D. Time Proximity

That means an examination of the time-proximity of the primary creating when compared to the functions they report. In the midst of skepticism from radical critics about supposed late dates for the creating of the New Testament, due to the fact of newly-uncovered New Testament manuscripts (total and fragmentary – which are incredibly early in day) it has turn out to be increasingly challenging for critics to hold to their earlier assumptions. Choose into thing to consider the following:

The courting of the Gospel of John: The John Rylands papyri fragment (P52) from Egypt (discovered in 1920) dated from 117 to 138, and probably as early as Advert 94. The truth that this creating was composed in possibly Palestine or Asia Slight, and still the fragment was discovered in Egypt, bears evidence that the Gospel of John had previously been copied several times and circulated. For this to have occurred, it had to have been composed early enough to allow for this rather large distribution. This at least pushes the day of John’s primary doc back into the middle or latter section of the 1st century – which pushes back the day of the primary files of the other Gospels even before.

Relationship the NT by way of the reserve of Functions: Quite a few evidences issue out that Functions had to have been composed at least prior to Advert (CE) 70. Roman historian Colin Hemer cites 15 affordable evidences for Functions getting composed in between Advert (CE) 60 and 62, which include these 4:

1) There is no mention in Functions of the very important event of the drop of Jerusalem in Advert 70.

2) There is no trace of the outbreak of the Jewish War in Advert  66 or of serious deterioration  of relations in between Romans and Jews just before that time.

three) There is no trace of the deterioration of Christian relations with Rome during the Neronian persecution of the late Advert 60′s.

four) There is no trace of the death of James at the arms of the Sanhedrin in Advert 62 which is recorded by Josephus in Antiquities of the Jews (twenty.9.1.two hundred).

The testimony of John A.T. Robinson – By the 1970′s, John A.T. Robinson had built a name as getting a “liberal” Bible scholar. He was regarded for his role in what was referred to as the “Demise of God” motion. In 1976, he surprised his colleagues with the revolutionary reserve Redating the New Testament in which he thoroughly examined the obtainable evidence for the courting of each New Testament reserve. Just after comprehensive thorough analysis, he concluded that all of the guides of the New Testament had been composed just before Advert 70 by the regular authors. Robinson even finished up courting NT guides before than the dates of his “conservative” friends. As Geisler states: “Robinson destinations Matthew at forty to following 60, Mark at about forty five to 60, Luke at just before fifty seven to following 60, and John  at from just before forty to following 65. This would signify that just one or two Gospels could have been composed as early as 7 several years following the crucifixion. At the latest, they had been all composed in just the lifetimes of eyewitnesses and contemporaries of the functions. Assuming the primary integrity and affordable precision of the writers, this would put the dependability of the New Testament files past affordable doubt” (Geisler, ECA)

Paul’s writings*: The early day of Paul’s writings, and what can be regarded of Jesus from Paul’s writings alone (Apart from the noticeable details of the Gospel and various teachings) Jesus was born a Jew(Gal. three:16) from the loved ones of David (Rom. 1:three) and lived underneath Jewish legislation (Gal. four:four). Jesus had brothers (I Cor. 9:5), just one of whom was James (I Cor. 15:seven), as effectively as twelve disciples (I Cor. 15:seven). Paul knew that at least some of Jesus’ brothers and apostles had wives (I Cor. 9:5). In truth, Paul knew personally James, as effectively as apostles Peter and John (Gal. 1:18-2:16). Paul also provides many of the specifics concerning the very last week of Jesus’ lifestyle (I Cor. 11:23-25 Rom. four:25 5:8 six:six Gal. 2:twenty I Thess. 2:fourteen-15 I Cor. 15:three-8). Creeds and Hymns in Paul’s epistles, as effectively as some other people, present some of the earliest documentary evidences of what accurate Christianity entailed (examples: Rom. 1:three-four I Cor. 11:23ff. 15:three-8 Phil. 2:six-11 Col 1:15-18 I Tim. three:16 2 Tim. 2:8 also John 1:1-18 I Peter 2:18-22 I John four:2). Dr. J.P. Moreland writes of three attribute features with regards to these hymns: Initial, they are pre-Pauline and incredibly early. They use language which is not characteristically Pauline, they frequently quickly translate back into Aramaic, and they show functions of Hebrew poetry and considered-types. This signifies that they arrived into existence whilst the church was seriously Jewish and that they grew to become common, acknowledged creeds and hymns effectively just before their incorporation into Paul’s letters. Most scholars day them from 33 to forty eight. Some, like Hengel, day many of them in the 1st ten years following Jesus’ death. Next, the articles of these creeds and hymns centers on the death, resurrection, and deity of Christ. They continually present a portrait of a miraculous and divine Jesus who rose from the dead. 3rd, they served as hymns of worship in the liturgy of the early assemblies and as didactic expressions for teaching the Christology of the church” (Moreland: Scaling the Secular Metropolis c.1987 pp. 148-149)

(*Note, I personally had the privilege of  viewing a web site of Papyrus forty six – just one of the oldest regarded Greek manuscript copies of the letters of Paul – containing a part of the reserve of Romans. This was produced obtainable for viewing at the The Dea Sea Scrolls and the Bible exhibit at the Milwaukee Community Museum, Jan. 22, 2010 – June six, 2010)

The church “fathers:” Regarding only the 4 Gospels, there are 19,368 citations from the church “fathers” courting from the late 1st century onward. Papias (as a companion of Polycarp, who was a disciple of the Apostle John) quoted John. From this truth the argument is produced that the Gospels had been in existence just before the finish of the 1st century.  It is really even been noted that there are enough quotations from the early church fathers that “even if we did not have a single copy of the Bible, scholars could however reconstruct all but 11 verses of the overall New Testament from product composed in just a hundred and fifty to two hundred several years from the time of Christ” (Mc Dowell, “Evidence for the Historical precision of the New Testament,” in The Intellectuals converse Out About God, 273-274, as reference by Dan Tale, Defending Your Faith, 38)

Dedication about the time for the growth of myth:

Roman historian A.N. Sherwin-White, possessing completed comprehensive experiments on the sum of time essential for “myth growth” to take put defiantly rejects the mythological view of the New Testament (Geisler ECA)

C.S. Lewis (Oxford / Cambridge scholar of mythology) dealt with the subject of “myth” and the Bible by stating: “People who equate the New Testament with mythology have not studied enough myth”

Dedication about time and the affect of myth:

Dr. Edwin Yamauchi (Professor of Historical past and Archaeology at Miami University Oxford, Ohio) provides comprehensive analysis on the subject of similarities from “stories of Greek gods” and concludes the stories had been not prior to but following the time of Christ. Consequently, if there is any affect of just one on the other, it is the affect of the historic event of the New Testament on the mythology, not the reverse” (ECA, 518) (For an exceptional, comprehensive breakdown and responses to the “Christianity copying mythology” arguments, think about checking out the J.P Keeping multi-essay examination obtainable at the following web page

 The Normal Historical Dependability of the New Testament:

The NT “Gospel” of Luke** (browse chapter 1 verses 1-four, together with noting that Luke was aphysician by profession) F.F. Bruce writes: “He (Luke) relates his story…to the broader context of history …courting hassle if not careful…he affords his readers so many chances for testing his precision.” Sir William Ramsey (deemed just one of the greatest archaeologists of all time) said “Luke is an historian of the 1st rank not simply are his statements of truth reputable he is possessed of the accurate historic sense…he seizes the important and essential functions and reveals their accurate nature at bigger length…in limited, this author need to be placed together with the incredibly greatest of historians” (** Note: I personally had the prospect to view a web site of Papyrus four, a incredibly aged Greek manuscript copy of the Gospel of Luke, which was produced obtainable for viewing at the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Bible Show at the Milwaukee Community Museum from Jan. 22, 2010 – June six, 2010)

Further-biblical and archeological evidence: For many several years (based mostly on silence about functions/persons and many others) further-biblical and archeological evidence prompted many to issue the reality of the Bible. Still, the a lot more persons have critiqued, when compared, and many others. the a lot more the scriptures come out shining (Examples: Gospel of John mentions the pool/swimming pools of Bethesda concerning which there was no evidence right until this very last century Details of governing and Roman judicial procedure – have been revealed to have been correct) 

Sherwin-White (the renowned archeologist) on the reserve of Functions: “To reject its primary historicity even in issues of detail need to now appear absurd” 

William L. Craig (philosopher, apologist, and author) on the Gospels: “The Gospels show an intimate knowledge of Jerusalem just before its destruction, indicating that they had been composed just before the awful event (in Advert 70)” “The Gospels are whole of references to correct names, dates, cultural specifics, historic functions, and viewpoints/customs of the time.” “The stories of Jesus’ weaknesses and the faults of the disciples are earmarks for authenticity”

Julius Africanus (an historical extrabiblical historian who wrote in about Advert 221) rates from a function that has been misplaced (by an jap Mediterranean – Thallus). Thallus wrote in Advert (CE) fifty two about an event in earlier several years of darkness which he clarifies away as most likely getting an eclipse of the sunlight. Also Phlegan – a Greek author from Caria creating a chronology soon following Advert 137 documented that (in the Advert 30′s) there was the “greatest eclipse of the sunlight” and that it grew to become “night” in the sixth hour of the day (i.e. noon) so that the stars even appeared in the heavens.

Will Durant (historian from this century –and not a good friend of Christianity) – from The Tale of Civilization opinions on the common dependability of the NT textual content: “If bigger criticism was utilized (in the similar severity) to other functions of antiquity, a hundred worthies (Hamurabi, Socrates and many others.) would fade into legend…After two hundreds of years of bigger criticism the outlines of the lifestyle, character, and teachings of Christ continue to be reasonably obvious, and constitute the most interesting element in the history of Western person”

John Warwick Montgomery (historian / legislation professor)“To be skeptical of the resultant textual content of the New Testament guides is to allow all of classical antiquity to slip into obscurity, for no files of the historical time period are as effectively attested bibliographically as the New Testament”

The NT getting “biased” as an obstacle to trustworthy history: Because this is a frequent “obstacle” offered with regards to the historic veracity of the NT, let us take into account the following troubles and rates with regards to irrespective of whether or not the authors of the New Testament had simply a biased agenda when creating:

The assumption of agendas developing inaccuracies: Initial, this contradicts the inside consistency exam (*see previously mentioned*). Also, Dr. Ben Witherington III tends to make a convincing situation for Gospels getting a unique form of genre, which incorporates history (Dr. Ben Witherington III, The Gospel Code) (For an exceptional essay refuting the “biased” argument about the precision of the New Testament see Glenn Miller’s examine at 

Also, this invites the issue: What we can know about Jesus / Christianity outside of the Biblical attestation?

 - Further-Biblical “pals” of Christianity: Regarding only the 4 Gospels, there are 19,368 citations from the church “fathers” courting from the late 1st century onward.

 - Further-Biblical “enemies” of Christianity: Using only further-biblical authors (largely antagonists of Christianity) these types of as Tacitus, Suetonius, Pliny the Younger, Josephus (and many others), Dr. Edwin Yamauchi (Professor of Historical past and Archaeology of Miami University in Oxford, Ohio) constructs the lifestyle of the human being of Christ in the following method:

“Initial, Jesus was a Jewish instructor 2nd, many persons thought that he done healings and exorcisms third, some persons thought he was the Messiah fourth, he was turned down by the Jewish leaders fifth, he was crucified underneath Pontius Pilate in the reign of Tiberius sixth, even with this shameful death, his followers, who thought that he was however alive, unfold past Palestine so that there had been multitudes of them in Rome by Advert sixty four and seventh, all types of persons from the towns and countryside-adult men and gals, slave and absolutely free-worshiped him as God”

The Most Formidable Impediment to Considering the NT as Historical: Naturalistic Dogmatism: This leads us to what is maybe the most formidable obstacle for many in with regards to the NT as getting traditionally trustworthy – that getting an Anti -supernatural bias (a priori). When the situation of anti-supernatural, a priori bias is elevated, just one issue which need to be questioned is no matter what occurred to theism? Is Antony Flew’s “conversion” to deism – and a creator “god” – definitely that far eradicated from a belief in a “god” who can act in history? (Curiously, entire world-renowned God belief antagonist Richard Dawkins, author of the finest-providing reserve The God Delusion a short while ago conceded during a public debate at Oxford University – Oct 21st, 2008 – that a great situation could be produced for a deistic rationalization of the universe. What many fall short to understand, or at least acknowledge, is that this straightforward “situation could be produced” acknowledgement is a radically abrupt worldview alter – from a “shut method naturalism” to an “open up method tremendousnaturalism.” If an infinite getting created, finally, anything out of almost nothing – is it so far-fetched to hold that this “getting” would/could reveal by itself by signifies of the miraculous? If the anti-supernatural bias is stripped away and the similar requirements that are often utilized to other functions in historical history are utilized to the New Testament, historiography bears frustrating evidence that God has revealed Himself as a result of the historic figure regarded as Jesus the Christ. Nonetheless, Witherington clarifies the fairly moot nature of this argument in gentle of our present article-modern day culture the place persons “are not much less vulnerable, but in truth are a lot more vulnerable, to imagine in miracles, magic and a host of other so-referred to as non-rational items.” In gentle of this, exposure of the double-common bias in rejecting the New Testament as history can be viewed: I.E It is not history just one will not settle for (Plato – with comparatively weak historiography), it is Christian history that just one will not settle for (Christ – with incredibly potent historiography). It is not “supernatural” functions just one refuses to settle for, it is Christian supernatural functions just one refuses to settle for.


Steven Collins, Championing the Faith

William Lane Craig, from Collins  op. cit.

Norman Geisler, Baker Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics

John AT Robinson, from Collins op. cit.

Dan Tale, Defending Your Faith                            

FF Bruce, from Collins op cit

Sir William Ramsey, from Collins op cit.

Gary Habermas, Why I Consider the New testament is Traditionally Responsible from Geisler/Hoffman eds. Why I Am A Christian

JP Keeping, “Texture Tantrum” on the web short article at

Colin Hemer, from Habermas op cit, from Geisler/Hoffman eds. Op cit.

Will Durant,from Collins op cit

John Warwick Montgomery, from Collins op cit

J.P. Moreland, “Scaling the Secular Metropolis

Winfried Corduan, Why I Consider the Bible Alone is the Word of Godfrom Geisler/Hoffman eds.

Why I Am a Christian

Edwin Yamauchi, from Lee Strobel The Situation for Christ

Ben Witherington III, The Gospel Code

Justin Brierley, The John Lennox – Richard Dawkins debate:

- Post Time: 09-23-16 - By: